Your cyber-IMproPRieties have hISTories
Labels: gathering darkness of all USian culture, intellectual property, intelprop, jstor
Where good taste, clear and distinct ideas, and graceful modulations tend to be viewed with lowering suspicion.
Labels: gathering darkness of all USian culture, intellectual property, intelprop, jstor
Labels: I kid you not, if markets are conversations what kind of conversation is this doc?, social media, twitter
Labels: social media, tv
Technology and changing habits have called into question the nature of the traditional humanities journal — a printed assembly of peer-reviewed articles, reviews, and notes and queries offered by subscription. "What we shared until recently was a sense that the academic journal appeared between covers as a deliberately constructed series of articles, sometimes on a common theme," Ms. Wheeler observed.
A journal started today, however, is likely to be online-only and open access [hanh?]. And more and more readers now discover bits and pieces of any journal's content — an article here, a book review there — through electronic databases and aggregators like
JStor, Project Muse, and Ebsco.
Editors of well-established humanities journals have mixed feelings about the changes.
More readers, more dollars: That makes editors happy. But they worry about how to carry the idea of a journal as an organized whole over into the digital world. "The journal itself becomes invisible to the end-user," Ms. Wheeler told her audience. Even as access to its content increases, "the identity of the journal is often lost."
"It's hard for me to imagine The Journal of American History becoming entirely digital anytime in the near future." — Edward T. Linenthal, editor
Labels: jstor, jstor syndrome, open access, open systems
The Clinton Administration and top Republican lawmakers reached an agreement early today to overhaul the financial system, repealing Depression-era laws that have restricted the banking, securities and insurance industries from expanding into one another's businesses.
Labels: commodification of news media, news, The New York Times
Labels: silly window syndrome
The Fed stepped in after JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc., which were brought in to help assess AIG, failed to come up with a solution, according to a person familiar with the talks. Liddy is currently on the board of Goldman, the company Henry Paulson ran as CEO before becoming the U.S. Treasury secretary in 2006.
Labels: AIG, apocalyptic economics, bailout, Edward Liddy, Eliot Spitzer
Labels: China, eunuch, leadership, phallus, politics, statecraft
This is no time to play nice.
Labels: lessig, monetizing the monetizers, money, politics
Labels: apocalyptic economics, bailout, banking, capitalism, money
In keeping with the falling value of newspapers nationwide, McClatchy's estimated value of its share of The [Seattle] Times has been eroding steadily. McClatchy acquired the Times share when it bought Knight Ridder in June 2006. In 2006, McClatchy valued its Times investment at $102.2 million. At the end of 2007, the value had fallen to $19.3 million.
The McClatchy Co., which owns 49.5 percent of The Times, has again cut the value of its share of the Seattle newspaper company -- this time to nothing. link
Labels: anxiety is the lifeblood of ignorance and ignorance is the carriage of US media, media and money, media matters, news, these are the people purporting to know the news
Labels: break jstor wide open, open access, open systems
Labels: gifthub, Lien i3 challenge, philanthropy, social good
Freddie Mac's chief executive officer, David Moffett, announced his resignation from the U.S. government-backed mortgage company just six months after being installed in that post by the company's regulator as part of a rescue operation.
The McLean, Va., company offered no immediate explanation for the resignation, effective March 13, but said that Mr. Moffett "indicated that he wants to return to a role in the financial services sector." A spokeswoman for Freddie said that the decision was Mr. Moffett's and that his resignation wasn't sought by the company's regulator, the Federal Housing Finance Agency.
Though Mr. Moffett's title is CEO, his job in many ways is more akin to that of a chief operating officer because the FHFA is running Freddie under a legal procedure known as conservatorship. As the conservator, the regulator assumes all the powers of the board and shareholders and seeks to restore the company to financial health.
A person close to Mr. Moffett said his decision partly reflected "frustration" with a job offering little freedom of maneuver. "He's a private sector guy," this person said.
In January alone, three of Fannie's most experienced investment managers -- Ramon de Castro, Paul Norris and Mike Lebowitz -- defected to other companies. Freddie recently lost Gary Kain, who was the head of its investments and capital markets operations before joining a private equity firm. Freddie has had only an acting chief financial officer since September.
Mr. Lockhart, the regulator, has argued that government ownership has gone well and that mortgage-market conditions would be much worse if it hadn't happened. Without government backing, he says, Fannie and Freddie "would have had to pull back dramatically from the market, which would have accelerated the downward spiral." When he was asked about the prospect that the federal government soon will be calling the shots at many more major financial institutions, though, Mr. Lockhart said in a recent interview: "I sure hope not."
Labels: credit markets, david moffett, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, housing bubble